The appellant was arrested on 30.12.2024 in connection with FIR No. 33/2022 registered under Sections 384, 420, 468, 471, 509 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and remanded to police custody for ...
The Argument In Pradeep Sharma vs. ED, the defense presented a clever argument: the PMLA could not be applied retrospectively to a bribe allegedly taken years before the law was enacted in its current ...
Stage 2: Disciplinary Inquiry. The preliminary report is then sent to the accused's Disciplinary Authority. The accused's own department initiates formal disciplinary action based on that report, with ...
Courts have long held that mere receipt of money obtained through cheating does not implicate a recipient as an accused unless evidence shows they: The burden lies on the prosecution to demonstrate ...
15. On the other hand, the learned counsel for the complainantrespondent No.2 contended that the FIR and Complaint Case preferred by her is not a counter-blast to the legal notice sent by the ...
2. The applications have approached this Court for being released on bail in C.R. No. 38 of 2003 registered at Gadhinglaj Police Station under Sections 498-A, 307, 302 read with 34 of Indian Penal ...
Citation: MANU/MH/1593/2003, 2004 ALLMR (CRI) 646. 1. Heard learned Counsel Mr. Bhangde, as well as Mr. Sonare, learned A.P.P. for the respondent/State. 2. The applicant had filed application below ...
The Supreme Court reasoned that the legislature uses the word "No" deliberately. It is a command that halts the general machinery of the CrPC. Without the specific high-level sanction (ADGP rank), the ...
The Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) serves as a specialized legislation aimed at combating the laundering of proceeds derived from criminal activity. A foundational principle of the ...
o CCL (Child in Conflict with Law): Alleged to have committed an offence. Authority: Juvenile Justice Board (JJB). o CNCP (Child in Need of Care & Protection): Victim, abandoned, or neglected.
Key findings in Dr Ashwani Kumar v. Union of India (2019) can be reduced to a few clear exam‑oriented points: The Court reaffirmed that torture in any form is inhuman, degrading, offends human dignity ...
· Adoption: Adopted by the UN General Assembly on 18 December 1979 and entered into force in 1981. · Status: Often described ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback